
So, call me the sceptical permaculturist if you want, but after my rant about mulch, today I'm going to go after companion planting. Not against the principle itself, which is great, but more on the subject of the over-optimistic and simplistic way with which the concept is sometimes approached. At times, I have myself enthusiastically and at length described the benefits of companion planting and how if you plant this plant with that plant you'll not only have an awesome trouble-free garden but you'll also save the world, and you won't even need a revolution! Hurray!
But then when you get down to it, all these pesky questions come up. How close does the borage need to be to the tomatoes in order to improve their growth and flavor? How far apart can you plant patches of calendula and still get their pest-repelling properties? How much marigolds do you need to make any difference to the nematodes? Basically, once you know what plants go together, the question becomes how do you plant them?
One thing I found really interesting while skimming through one of the myriad organic gardening books in a bookstore was that the effect of companion plants varies greatly depending on the circumstances. In "Jardiner Durablement", Jean-Michel Groult gives the example of sage, a companion to cabbage (it repels cabbage butterflies, supposedly). It grows best in a hot, well drained soil, but will give off almost no volatile chemical compounds in these circumstances, whereas it will do so more readily in moist soil, though it might not grow as well. This was really interesting to me, and it makes a lot of sense. The quality of the soil, air and soil humidity, soil pH, nutrient content and so on will all affect a plant's growth and therefore its quality as a companion.
You can start reading up on this subject and just never get to the end of it. But ultimately, I think the best advice is that of Jon Jeavons in "How To Grow More Vegetables": it's up to each gardener to try out combinations of plants and find out which ones work well in the specific context of each garden. He advises to start with combinations of few plants (only 2 or 3), in order to be able to really figure out what's going on.
I think this kind of experimentation is really very valuable, because you can't really rely on lists of companion planting combinations without testing them (and generally the planting details to make these combinations work are not mentioned). And then again sometimes you'll find that some unusual combinations will work in your particular context. In a broadcast bed we threw some peppergrass seeds and some alfalfa (among other things). The peppergrass started growing in patches where the seeds had fallen, and later the alfalfa started growing through the peppergrass. What I think happened here was that since we gave little care and little watering to this bed, the alfalfa seeds only sprouted successfully under the protective cover of the peppergrass, and the patches of bare ground where no peppergrass seed had fallen remained barren of alfalfa also. Who would have thought? Of course, to replicate this kind of thing with other plants you would really need to know the plants' growing habits well. This is the kind of thing you can only figure out by trying combinations of plants in the garden.
Has anyone out there done any interesting experiments? What combinations of plants have you found to work well in your garden?


